Seat Toledo 1991 vs Mazda 323 1989
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 124 NM | 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 19 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.34 m | |
Seat Toledo is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |