Seat Toledo 1991 vs Fiat Croma 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 162 HP | |
Torque: | 124 NM | 213 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 91 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 10.0 | |
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 20 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |