Seat Toledo 1991 vs Citroen Xantia 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xantia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 32 HP less power than Citroen Xantia, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Citroen Xantia. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.2 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Citroen Xantia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Citroen Xantia, so Citroen Xantia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |