Seat Toledo 1994 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.4 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.34 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |