Seat Toledo 1995 vs Rover 400 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 14 HP more power than Rover 400, but torque is 5 NM less than Rover 400. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.6 | |
Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Rover 200 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Seat Toledo and Rover 400 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 720 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`690 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |