Seat Toledo 1995 vs Rover 400 1995

 
Seat Toledo
1995 - 1999
Rover 400
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP136 HP
Torque: 180 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.5 seconds
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Toledo engine produces 14 HP more power than Rover 400, but torque is 5 NM less than Rover 400. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.6
Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway910 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat CordobaUsed also on Rover 200
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.32 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Seat Toledo and Rover 400 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data720 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`690
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv