Seat Toledo 1995 vs Mazda 323 1994

 
Seat Toledo
1995 - 1999
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP147 HP
Torque: 180 NM183 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.4 seconds
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Toledo engine produces 3 HP more power than Mazda 323, but torque is 3 NM less than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.5 l/100km11.8 l/100km
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
570 km with real consumption460 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat CordobaInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda Xedos 9
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.24 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.36 m
Seat Toledo is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data300 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 323.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`430
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mazda 323 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv