Seat Toledo 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 35 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Kia Sephia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.4 | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Sephia, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |