Seat Toledo 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 166 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 35 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Kia Sephia. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.9 | |
Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Sephia, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |