Seat Toledo 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Kia Sephia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 5 HP less power than Kia Sephia, but torque is 25 NM more than Kia Sephia. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.9 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia Sephia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Sephia, so Kia Sephia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |