Seat Toledo 1995 vs Honda Civic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 41 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.3 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Seat Toledo and Honda Civic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 835 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Civic has
| |