Seat Toledo 1995 vs Rover 400 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 37 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Seat Toledo and Rover 400 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 720 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |