Seat Toledo 2013 vs Volvo V40 Cross Country 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo V40 Cross Country, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo V40 Cross Country. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.5 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 Cross Country, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40 Cross Country, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 55 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Toledo has 280 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40 Cross Country. This could mean that the Seat Toledo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40 Cross Country. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
| |