Seat Toledo 2013 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 66 HP less power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Chevrolet Cruze. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 413 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 137 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. The Chevrolet Cruze may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`823 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |