Seat Toledo 2001 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo and Ford Mondeo have the same engine power, but Seat Toledo torque is 5 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.9 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 29 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |