Seat Toledo 2000 vs Ford Mondeo 2003

 
Seat Toledo
2000 - 2004
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP110 HP
Torque: 148 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds11.6 seconds
Seat Toledo engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite less power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1050 km on highway
730 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.73 m
Width: 1.74 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Toledo is 29 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data500 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`865
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Seat Toledo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv