Seat Toledo 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.6 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 29 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |