Seat Toledo 1991 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 73 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 180 NM | 132 - 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.1 | 5.8 - 8.5 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |