Seat Toledo 1991 vs Mazda 323 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Toledo is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 323 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 56 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 180 NM | 99 - 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.1 | 5.9 - 9.2 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. On average, a Seat Toledo with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 323. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 21 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 309 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`519 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |