Seat Toledo 1991 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Toledo is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 71 - 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 180 NM | 119 - 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | 9.2 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.1 | 6.4 - 11.6 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |