Seat Toledo 1991 vs Fiat Croma 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.9 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 92 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 180 NM | 162 - 247 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | 8.2 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.1 | 5.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Seat Toledo petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Croma. On average, Seat Toledo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 20 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |