SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Mazda Xedos 9 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 164 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 212 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 86 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 138 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 9 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda MX-6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 9 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
| SAAB 9-5 is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 2 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |