SAAB 9-5 2001 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 8 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Kia Carnival, Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 75 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is larger. SAAB 9-5 is 8 cm longer than the Rover 75, 1 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |