SAAB 9-5 2002 vs SAAB 9-5 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
SAAB 9-5 1997 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 2002 engine produces 50 HP less power than SAAB 9-5 1997, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.6 | |
The SAAB 9-5 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 2002 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5 1997, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1440 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
SAAB 9-5 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-5 2002 is 3 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5 1997, width is practically the same , while the height of SAAB 9-5 2002 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 9.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |