SAAB 9-5 1999 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006

 
SAAB 9-5
1999 - 2001
Chevrolet Epica
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 200 HP156 HP
Torque: 310 NM237 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds9.9 seconds
SAAB 9-5 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-5 engine produces 44 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.19.3
Real fuel consumption: 11.1 l/100km9.7 l/100km
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-5 could require 270 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-5 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway950 km on highway
670 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km360'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 9-5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years14 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Epica might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.79 m1.81 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-5 and Chevrolet Epica are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data480 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`985
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 10002400
Rating in user reviews: 9.4/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-5 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Chevrolet Epica has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv