SAAB 9-5 1997 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 214 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 295 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-5 engine produces 64 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.0 | |
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.40 m | |
SAAB 9-5 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 2 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means SAAB 9-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |