SAAB 9-5 1997 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 230 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.6 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 11.1 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
SAAB 9-5 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-5 and Chevrolet Epica are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |