SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997

 
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2002
Chevrolet Camaro
1997 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel3.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP203 HP
Torque: 260 NM305 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds8.5 seconds
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 88 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.210.0
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9-3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.92 m
Width: 1.71 m1.88 m
Height: 1.43 m1.30 m
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but higher.
SAAB 9-3 is 29 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 17 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data923 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`872
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 20005600
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Chevrolet Camaro has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv