SAAB 9-3 2004 vs Mazda 6 2005

 
SAAB 9-3
2004 - 2007
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 120 HP121 HP
Torque: 280 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1010 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 9-3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda 5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.69 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-3 is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data501 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`980
Safety:
Quality:
high

high
SAAB 9-3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so SAAB 9-3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher safety
Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv