SAAB 9-3 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998

 
SAAB 9-3
2004 - 2007
Alfa Romeo 166
1998 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP136 HP
Torque: 280 NM304 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds9.9 seconds
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 16 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.87.3
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.72 m
Width: 1.76 m1.82 m
Height: 1.47 m1.42 m
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but higher.
SAAB 9-3 is 8 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 6 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data500 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 14001200
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv