SAAB 9-3 2003 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
SAAB 9-3
2003 - 2007
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP170 HP
Torque: 167 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds9.6 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 48 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.99.6
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway970 km on highway
SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-3 is 6 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv