SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo V50 2007

 
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 255 HP230 HP
Torque: 350 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds6.9 seconds
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 25 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo V50.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.48.7
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.52 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.50 m1.46 m
SAAB 9-3 is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres417 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26003600
Rating in user reviews: 9.5/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo V50 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv