SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006

 
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Volvo C70
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 320 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds11.8 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.99.6
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway880 km on highway
SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo C70 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years13 years
Engine spread: Used also on SAAB 9-5Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo C70 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data404 litres
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage capacity.
SAAB 9-3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0402`090
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54005600
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volvo C70 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv