SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo C70 2007

 
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Volvo C70
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 180 HP136 HP
Torque: 370 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds11.1 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 44 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.3
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway980 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 1 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data404 litres
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage capacity.
SAAB 9-3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`960
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54005600
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volvo C70 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv