SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Chrysler Sebring 2003

 
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 1999
Chrysler Sebring
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 185 HP141 HP
Torque: 230 NM188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds12.3 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 44 HP more power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.09.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.7 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 285 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway880 km on highway
630 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Chrysler Sebring gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.92 m
Width: 1.71 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.40 m
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
SAAB 9-3 is 29 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 5 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 295 litres320 litres
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space.
SAAB 9-3 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`990
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 24003400
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Chrysler Sebring has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv