SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Volvo V70 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2002
Volvo V70
2013 - 2016
Body: CoupeEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
SAAB 9-3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.31.6 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 225 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 177 - 342 NM240 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 13 seconds6.6 - 13.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 10.84.2 - 10.2
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.81 m
Width: 1.71 m1.87 m
Height: 1.43 m1.55 m
SAAB 9-3 is smaller.
SAAB 9-3 is 18 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 16 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data575 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1580 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`600~ 2`277
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 20009000
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V70 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv