SAAB 9-3 2002 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 320 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.5 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 9.5 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
On average, the SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Chevrolet Epica. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but slightly higher. SAAB 9-3 is 16 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 5 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`577 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |