SAAB 9-3 2005 vs Volvo V40 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 250 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 350 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.5 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 11.0 | 5.4 - 10.4 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.41 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is larger. SAAB 9-3 is 17 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1421 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, SAAB 9-3 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the SAAB 9-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`579 | ~ 1`789 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |