SAAB 9-3 2005 vs Volvo V50 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| SAAB 9-3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V50 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 250 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 350 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.5 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 11.0 | 5.0 - 10.2 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 is 14 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1307 litres | |
| SAAB 9-3 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`579 | ~ 1`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |