SAAB 9000 1991 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9000 engine produces 83 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 121 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power SAAB 9000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.4 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9000 consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9000 could require 555 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9000 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9000 is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 3 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9000 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9000 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9000 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |