Rover 75 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, but torque is 30 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Rover 75 is 2 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 68 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |