Rover 75 2004 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007

 
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Chevrolet Epica
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 131 HP150 HP
Torque: 300 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds10.1 seconds
Chevrolet Epica is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 19 HP less power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
820 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.45 m
Rover 75 is smaller.
Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space.
Rover 75 has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 14002400
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Chevrolet Epica has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv