Rover 75 2004 vs SAAB 9-5 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 4 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 20 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.6 | |
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1380 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 8 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |