Rover 75 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 39 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.1 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Rover 75 is 2 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 68 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |