Rover 75 2004 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 14 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.6 | |
| Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 475 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |