Rover 75 2004 vs Volkswagen Passat 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 133 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |