Rover 75 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 15 HP less power than Chevrolet Evanda, but torque is 79 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Despite less power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 9.6 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Evanda, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |