Rover 75 2004 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 59 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.9 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |