Rover 75 2004 vs Rover 75 1999

 
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP120 HP
Torque: 215 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds13.2 seconds
Rover 75 2004 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 75 2004 engine produces 30 HP more power than Rover 75 1999, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Rover 75 1999. Thanks to more power Rover 75 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.99.4
The Rover 75 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 75 2004 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75 1999, which means that by driving the Rover 75 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway860 km on highway
Rover 75 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 75 1999 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 3 years11 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 45
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 75 1999 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.75 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Rover 75 2004 and Rover 75 1999 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litres432 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 14001800
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Rover 75 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv