Rover 75 2004 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP180 HP
Torque: 160 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 60 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.410.0
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway920 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Rover 75 is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litres1034 litres
Rover 75 has 8 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 602 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 14001600
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv