Rover 75 1999 vs Audi A6 2001

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Audi A6
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP130 HP
Torque: 185 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds10.5 seconds
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi A6, but torque is 10 NM less than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.18.3
Real fuel consumption: 11.9 l/100km10.6 l/100km
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 420 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway1090 km on highway
540 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Rover 45Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A6 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres551 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Audi A6 has more luggage space.
Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`945
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 18001600
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more power
Audi A6 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv